Three patients had transient VL elevations (‘blips’) of 92, 48 and 280 copies/mL; one patient had a single VL of 4109 copies/mL related to drug discontinuation, and

another a transient VL of 1823 copies/mL. None of these patients had VF at the end of the study. Among patients with VF, no blips were detected prior to VF during follow-up. The median plasma trough concentration was 2.5 μg/mL (range 0.7–8.6 μg/mL) at week 24 (or at the visit before VF), and 2.5 μg/mL (range 0.4–3.8 μg/mL) at the time of VF. Median amprenavir concentration in CSF was 28.1 ng/mL (range 6.39–83.6 ng/mL). All CSF amprenavir concentrations were above or in the reported 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) range for wild-type HIV unadjusted Natural Product Library ic50 for protein binding (5.4–14.6 ng/mL) [17,18]. VL was undetectable in all CSF (n=10; week 24) and semen (n=5; three at week 24 and two at week 48) samples, coinciding with an undetectable plasma VL. The median CD4 count increased significantly during the study from 403 cells/μL (range 103–825 cells/μL) to 480 cells/μL (range 182–864 cells/μL) (P=0.032). No grade 3–4 laboratory abnormalities were found. There were no differences in

adherence or plasma amprenavir trough levels (data not shown) between patients with VF and those without VF. Although our data suggest that this strategy does not compromise future treatment options in most patients, as VL was re-suppressed in the majority of patients with resumption of their baseline NRTI (in agreement with the results Forskolin datasheet of the OK study [1]), this pilot trial with FPV/r monotherapy has shown an unacceptably high C59 nmr rate of VF, in addition to the presence of major PI mutations conferring resistance to FPV/r in one patient and minor PI mutations in three patients. There are few available data on HIV replication control in CSF in patients receiving PI monotherapy. We detected no replication in the CSF samples analysed, and amprenavir concentrations were above or in the IC50 range for wild-type virus in all samples, as has been reported for amprenavir

[10] and other PI/r regimens [8,9]. PI penetration in the male genital tract seems limited. However, some activity has been observed with LPV/r and DRV/r [13,15] in monotherapy scenarios. In the small number of semen samples collected, our data suggest that FPV/r monotherapy has antiviral activity in this reservoir. In previous studies of PI/r monotherapy, several factors such as poor adherence, low haemoglobin, and low CD4 cell counts were associated with VF [5,19]. Our patient sample was too small to allow evaluation of VF-related factors. Despite the limitations of this pilot study, and the small number of reservoir samples analysed (only 10 CSF samples at week 24 without baseline sample and five semen samples), we believe that it provides relevant new information about the antiviral activity of FPV/r monotherapy in plasma and CSF.