2003). Vellinga et al. (2003) detected similar major clades (Fig. 1 in their paper), however, only one of the clades
containing M. excoriata, M. mastoidea, M. “spec. nov. 1” (which is M. orientiexcoriata) and M. phaeodisca got bootstrap support. In our present study, two of the three clades recovered by the ITS data set got strong bootstrap and Bayesian post probability supports. The separation of the three clades is supported by morphological characters and will be discussed as following: /volvatae clade (Clade 1) is characterized by species having a volva at the base of the stipe, finely squamulous stipe surfaces, S3I-201 cost relatively small (usually less than 15 μm) amygdaliform-ellipsoid spores, and no clamp connections at the selleckchem base of the cheilocystidia and basidia. Species of this clade so far are mainly distributed in tropical regions (Vellinga 2003; Vellinga and Yang
2003). /macrosporae clade (Clade 2) is characterized by a smooth stipe, a simple annulus and rare clamp connections. In contrast to MG-132 clinical trial those in /macrolepiota clade, species within this clade do not have big plate-like squamules on pileus, but furfuraceous fine squamules composed of a single layer with rarely branched, pale brownish and thin-walled cylindrical hyphae. /macrolepiota clade (Clade 3) is characterized by having a complex annulus, relatively big (usually 14–20 μm) ovoid-ellipsoid spores, with a common presence of clamp connections at the base of the cheilocystidia and basidia, stipe usually 2-3 time the pileus diameter (Bon 1996), and the cheilocystidia are mainly broadly clavate. The stipes usually have fine brown squamules, but M. dolichaula and M. clelandii have farinose stipe surfaces. The pileus covering of species within this clade forms big-plate like squamules, and the squamules are composed of two layers with the terminal layer composed of seldom branched brownish and thick-walled cylindrical tuclazepam hyphae arising from a layer which is composed of thin-walled, often branched hyphae (but M. dolichaula is the exception here as well). Infrageneric classification
and systematic position of species with volva in Macrolepiota In traditional taxonomic classifications, Singer partitioned Macrolepiota into two groups (section Macrolepiota and section Macrosporae) based on the presence or absence of clamp connections (Singer 1986). Bon (1996) divided the genus Macrolepiota into three sections by adding sect. Laevistipedes (Pázmány) Bon. Vellinga (2003) transferred the section Laevistipedes to the genus Chlorophyllum, and Vellinga and Yang (2003) synonymized Volvolepiota with Macrolepiota without discussion of the taxonomic positions of those species with a volva within the genus. In this study, our molecular phylogenetic analysis recovered three major clades with strong statistical support.