0% of upper extremity reconstruction patients experienced no post

0% of upper extremity reconstruction patients experienced no postoperative functional deficits, and 70.6% of lower extremity reconstruction patients achieved ambulatory status (without assistance). Of the 177 patients, 74.6% had no evidence of disease at last known follow-up.\n\nConclusions. Reconstructive surgery in children with cancer is complex and often requires multiple procedures, although treatment usually results in excellent functional outcomes. A multidisciplinary

approach is essential Belinostat solubility dmso in the treatment of these patients, who are still in their growth phase, to optimize their functional capacity, quality of life, and overall survival.”
“OBJECTIVE: To study the feasibility and acceptability of using video Internet communication to teach and evaluate surgical skills in a low-resource setting.\n\nMETHODS: This case-controlled study used video Internet communication for surgical skills teaching and evaluation. We randomized intern physicians rotating in the Obstetrics and Gynecology

Department at Mulago Hospital at Makerere University in Kampala, Uganda, to the control arm (usual practice) or intervention arm (three video teaching sessions with University of California, San Francisco faculty). We made preintervention and postintervention selleck inhibitor videos of all interns tying knots using a small video camera and uploaded the files to a file hosting service that offers cloud storage. A blinded faculty member graded all of the videos. Both groups completed a survey at the end of the study.\n\nRESULTS: We randomized 18 interns with complete data for eight in the intervention group and seven in the control group. We found score improvement of 50%

or more in six of eight (75%) interns in the intervention group compared with one of seven (14%) in the control group (P-.04). Scores declined in five of the seven (71%) controls but in none in the intervention group. Both intervention and control groups used attendings, colleagues, and the Internet as sources for learning about knot-tying. CA3 concentration The control group was less likely to practice knot-tying than the intervention group. The trainees and the instructors felt this method of training was enjoyable and helpful.\n\nCONCLUSION: Remote teaching in low-resource settings, where faculty time is limited and access to visiting faculty is sporadic, is feasible, effective, and well-accepted by both learner and teacher.”
“Background/Objective: G-8 screening tool showed good screening properties for identifying vulnerable elderly patients with cancer who would benefit from a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). We investigated whether tumour site and metastatic status affected its accuracy.\n\nMaterials and Methods: Design: Cross-sectional analysis of a prospective cohort study. Setting: Geriatric-oncology clinics of two teaching hospitals in the urban area of Paris.

Comments are closed.