3% in 2007 and 50.4% in 2010). HIV testing uptake during the last year did not demonstrate any change either: 22.6% and 26.3% had been tested in 2007 and 2010, respectively. Perception of the risk of HIV ERK signaling inhibitor infection was measured among MSM in the 2010 survey. It was found that 11.2% evaluated their HIV infection risk as high, 22.3% evaluated their risk as moderate and 24.8% evaluated it as low, and 22.7% believed that they had no risk of HIV infection. We investigated factors associated with HIV testing among MSM, as this group has demonstrated the highest HIV prevalences of all key populations in Georgia. Bivariate

and multivariate analyses of 140 respondents with never testing practice are shown in Table 1. In bivariate analysis, age, level selleckchem of education, and condom use with the last anal sex partner did not show a significant association with never having been tested. Those who were aware of places where HIV tests could be taken were significantly less likely to never have been tested (OR 0.05; 95% CI 0.02–0.1). Safe sex practice appeared to be significantly associated with testing uptake: MSM reporting consistent condom use during anal intercourse with a male partner in the last 12 months had lower odds of not having been

tested during their lifetime (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.33–0.93). Perception of the risk of HIV infection turned out also to be associated with testing practices: those MSM who considered themselves as being at no risk of HIV infection were almost four times more likely to never have been tested for HIV (OR 3.75; 95% CI 1.51–9.34). Preventive programme coverage was identified as another predictor of HIV testing uptake.

Those MSM who reported being covered by HIV prevention programmes (who knew where to go for HIV testing and had received condoms from preventive programmes during the last 12 months) were less likely to never have been tested for HIV (OR 0.08; 95% CI 0.04–0.14). In the tuclazepam multivariate analysis, two factors remained significantly associated with never having been tested for HIV. These factors were knowledge about HIV testing locations (AOR 0.12; 95% CI 0.04–0.32) and being covered by HIV preventive programmes (AOR 0.26; 95% CI 0.12–0.56). Perception of having no risk of HIV infection (AOR 3.25; 95% CI 1.04–10.21) appeared to be marginally associated with never having been tested for HIV. The study has demonstrated that multiple factors influence HIV testing behaviour among key populations. Knowledge about the availability of HIV testing services is an important determinant of testing; however, it represents only one of the factors necessary for improving testing behaviour. According to 2009–2010 data, HIV testing behaviour is not satisfactory among the two groups studied. FSWs demonstrated a high level of knowledge about the availability of HIV testing services. However, this high level of knowledge did not translate into a high level of testing uptake.