Key features of IMC data at subinhibitory

Key features of IMC data at subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics. For subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics, IMC provides a detailed record of heat RXDX-101 mouse production related to bacterial activity including growth. The heat flow and heat curves show that heat-producing activity is far from constant, and suggest that the curves are potential

“”signatures”" for a given bacteria, growth medium and antibiotic that also may help us understand antibiotic modes of action. The following key features of the heatflow (P vs. t) and aggregate heat (Q vs. t) curves are used in the subsequent discussion of our results: Delay in AZD5363 manufacturer time of onset of detectable heat flow. (t delay ) Detectable heat flow means there are a sufficient number of active bacteria to produce a heat signal above the instrument’s detection limit. If the initial number of bacteria present does not produce detectable heat, then subsequent detection of a heat signal essentially https://www.selleckchem.com/products/AZD6244.html constitutes detection of increased bacterial activity potentially including growth. For the initial bacterial concentrations used here, some bacteria exhibit a t delay which is a function of antibiotic concentration. A clear example of an antibiotic producing a t delay alone is the effect of Cefoxitin on E. coli. The effect can be seen in either the heat flow rate (Fig. 1A) or cumulative heat data (Fig. 1B). Agents which produce delays in onset of growth are generally

termed “”bacteriostatic.”" Thus for a given PI3K inhibitor growth environment and initial bacterial concentration, t delay values could be used to compare levels of bacteriostatic activity. Maximum rate of heat production (P max ). In all examples presented here, a transient maximum rate of heat production P max was observed. In many of the examples, the magnitude of P max declined as a function of increasing subinhibitory antibiotic concentration. The effect of Amikacin on E. coli is a clear example (Fig. 3A), as is the effect of Chloramphenicol on S. aureus (Fig. 5A). In some cases there was also a substantial second transient

maximum of lower value (See Fig. 1A, E. coli and Cefazolin and Fig. 4A, S. aureus and Vancomycin). The value P max is the aggregate rate of heat production of all bacteria present at the time when the maximum occurs. It depends on both the number of active bacteria present at that time, and the rate at which each bacteria present is producing heat at that time. A separate measurement of the number of bacteria present would be needed in order to use the result to determine the mean heat production per bacterium at the time of the maximum. So while the “”P max effect”" is interesting as part of the “”signature”" of the thermodynamic response of bacteria to antibiotics, it is not possible to tell whether the antibiotic is affecting the number of bacteria present, their mean rate of heat production or both.

Comments are closed.