Likewise a portion of catechol gene 1.27 kb (C23O) was pulled out using F: 5′- ATG AGC AAC AAA

TAC GAA TT- 3′ and R: 5′- TCA AAC GGT CAA TCT GAT AT- 3′ primers, with 1.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase in a 25 μL reaction mixture, consisting of 100 ng of genomic DNA, 20 pmol of each primer, 200 μM dNTPs and 1X Taq GSK2118436 datasheet buffer with 1.5 mM MgCl2. PCR was conducted using the following temperature profile: initial denaturation at 93 °C for 2 min, then 30 cycles of 1 min at 93 °C, 35 s at 45 °C, and 1.5 min at 72 °C; and finally an extension reaction of 5 min at 72 °C. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 1% agarose TAE gels. The expected DNA bands of 0.26/1.27 kb were excised from Gefitinib gel and purified using the Gel Extraction Kit (Sigma–Aldrich, USA) as per the manufacturer’s protocol. Sequencing reactions were carried out with a Big Dye Terminator cycle sequencing kit by using ABI Prism 3100 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Fig. 1(a–c) illustrates the morphology, SEM image and phylogenic profile of the isolate MTCC 5514 employed in the present study. The bacterial colony has irregular margin, rough

surface with pink pigmentation. The staining studies revealed the Gram +ve nature of the isolate and the SEM analysis suggested the short rod nature of the isolate. The phylogenic profile infers the isolate MTCC 5514 belongs to Bacillus licheniformis. The distance matrix showed the genetic distance value between MTCC 5514 with B. licheniformis ATCC 14580 was 0.004. Anthracene biodegradation study carried out at 37 °C under shaking conditions using MTCC 5514 displayed an interesting observation. The physical

observations made during the growth suggested that from day 1 to till day 7 most of the anthracene molecules (irrespective of the concentrations studied) were settled at the bottom of the flask, despite, much turbidity in the external medium due to the growth of the organisms. However, after day 15, deposition of only fewer anthracene molecules at lower concentration than higher concentrations was observed. Further, after 22 days, no P-type ATPase deposits were found at lower concentration, however, a fewer deposits were at higher concentration. Samples withdrawn at scheduled time intervals (10, 16 and 22 days) were subjected to various analyses after extracting with ethyl acetate. However, before extraction, analysis such as pH, biomass and surface activity were made for all the concentrations. The percentage of degradation of anthracene was calculated based on the absorption displayed in UV–visible spectral analysis at 254 nm and using standard graph. Fig. 2a displays the growth profile of the isolate MTCC 5514 in the presence of anthracene at 100–1000 ppm concentration. The chosen isolate MTCC 5514 showed a bi-phasic growth profile in the presence of anthracene at 100 and 300 ppm concentration.