munda (Silva 1966) and as D. ligulata (Graham et al. 2007) from Galapagos respectively. Whether D. tropica, also described from Galapagos, is another peculiar form or subspecies of D. herbacea remains to be examined. The closest relatives of our European isolates of D. dudresnayi according to our sequence analyses are samples originally identified as D. patagonica Asensi (Chile) and D. tabacoides PD0332991 cell line (our new samples from Korea as well as

the old isolate from California), which are all isolates with monoecious gametophytes. We had no cultures from our samples from Korea but Japanese D. tabacoides was shown to be monoecious (Nakahara and Nakamura 1971). In contrast to D. dudresnayi, where branched (Léman 1819) as well as unbranched (Montagne 1842, as D. pinnatinervia Montagne; Crouan and Crouan 1852, as D. dudresnayi forma simplex; Sauvageau 1925) thalli have been reported (also see above), no branched specimens are known from either D. patagonica (Asensi and Gonçalves 1972, Pinto 1989, Ramirez and Peters 1992, Asensi and Küpper 2012) or D. tabacoides. On the other hand, unbranched sporophytes of D. dudresnayi and D. patagonica are indistinguishable in size and morphology (compare our Fig. 2 with the figures in Asensi and Gonçalves 1972, Ramirez and Peters 1992). Due to monoecism of D. dudresnayi,

D. patagonica, and D. tabacoides we have not attempted cross-fertility experiments. The genetic distances among our samples of D. dudresnayi, D. patagonica, and D. tabacoides are comparable to those MCE among different samples of D. ligulata Doramapimod and we thus propose to merge the unbranched to little branched broad-bladed taxa in D. dudresnayi and to reduce D. tabacoides and D. patagonica to subspecies. The latter treatment may also be justified for unbranched ligulate Desmarestia from Tristan da Cunha (South Atlantic; described as D. sivertsenii Baardseth (Baardseth 1941) and from the northeast Pacific where it is described as D. foliacea (Pease 1917,

1920). Our isolate of unbranched Desmarestia from California, previously identified as D. tabacoides (Peters et al. 1997) is slightly genetically different from our new Korean sample and possibly represents D. foliacea. Two specimens from Friday Harbor (Washington, USA; type locality of D. foliacea), kindly sent to us by Brian Wysor, were morphologically similar to unbranched D. dudresnayi. The literature knows two different spellings of the specific epithet of D. dudresnayi, honoring the first collector of the alga, Guy du Dresnay (1770–1837; Dizerbo 1965). The longer spelling, dudresnayi, was used in the protologue by Léman (1819). In fact, Léman provided the name as D. dudresnay, containing an automatically correctable error; see Anderson 1985, footnote on p. 438.