Pattern of decline appears not to be age-dependent Fig. 4 eGFR changes in patients followed for more than 5 years #Selleckchem Rabusertib randurls[1|1|,|CHEM1|]# (n = 36). The change points varied in relation to age or eGFR level. Other patients are shown in blue for easy identification The effects of age on the eGFR and TKV slopes are examined in Table 3. Forty-six patients whose TKV slopes were measured were divided into younger or older age groups for comparison purposes. Between the two groups, the difference in eGFR was statistically significant but differences in the eGFR slope, 1/Cr slope, TKV or TKV slope were not significant.

Table 3 Comparison of the slopes of eGFR and TKV between the two age groups   Younger group Older group P value Age group (years) 13–41 42–75   Mean age (years) 34 ± 6.4 57 ± 10.5

  Male/female 11/12 7/16   eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) 87.0 ± 29.5 55.9 ± 19.7 <0.0001 eGFR Selleck Everolimus slope (ml/min/1.73 m2/year) −4.6 ± 7.3 −2.1 ± 3.1 0.1540 eGFR slope/initial eGFR (%/year) −4.2 ± 9.2 −4.4 ± 7.6 0.9640 1/Cr slope (dl/mg/year) −0.06 ± 0.10 −0.03 ± 0.06 0.3876 1/Cr slope/initial 1/Cr × 100 (%/year) −3.0 ± 8.1 −3.8 ± 7.1 0.7535 TKV (ml) 1509.3 ± 874.3 1840.8 ± 1001.2 0.2381 TKV slope (ml/year) 110.2 ± 207.5 63.5 ± 96.0 0.3326 TKV slope/initial TKV (%/year) 7.6 ± 10.3 3.6 ± 6.6 0.1215 Log TKV slope (log ml/year) 0.03 ± 0.04 0.01 ± 0.03 0.1877 Log TKV slope/initial log TKV (%/year) 0.9 ± 1.4 0.4 ± 1.0 0.1580 Forty-six patients whose TKV slopes were measured were divided into younger and older age groups for comparison. Data are the mean ± SD. P values were calculated by Student’s t test The initially measured eGFRs and log-transformed TKV are plotted against age in normotensive and hypertensive patients in Fig. 5a, b, respectively. In both figures, the regression lines for normotensive and

hypertensive patients were not considered to be identical, with different y-intercepts, since there was a significant difference (P < 0.01, F test) in the y-intercept of the two regression lines under the null hypothesis that the y-intercept of the two lines was equal. There was no significant difference (P = 0.6061 in Fig. 5a or P = 0.6079 in Fig. 5b, F test) in the slope of the two lines under C1GALT1 the null hypothesis that the slope of the two lines was equal. Fig. 5 a Initially measured eGFRs are plotted against age in normotensive (blue) and hypertensive (red) patients. Regression analysis for normal blood pressure group: y = 151.08 − 1.546x (where y = eGFR and x = age, r = −0.7791, P < 0.0001, n = 70) and that for hypertensive group: y = 132.30 − 1.666x (r = −0.6587, P < 0.0001, n = 158). b The relationship between age and log-transformed TKV in normotensive (blue) and hypertensive (red) patients.