Similar quantities of LT (0.2 μg) and eGFP (0.1 μg) were administered Tanespimycin cell line to those animals receiving LT + eGFP or eGFP alone. For subsequent immunisations, doses equivalent to a total of 0.4 and 0.8 μg of total protein was administered. In a second experiment, eGFPPLY was administered at the same concentration as described above for the first three immunisations, however a fourth 0.8 μg dose was also given. In this

experiment, the concentration of eGFPΔ6PLY and LT were increased tenfold resulting in concentrations of 2, 4, and 8 μg of toxins given in each subsequent dose. For the LT group an approximately similar equimolar concentration of eGFP was admixed with the toxin. Animals given eGFP alone were immunised using the concentration of eGFP administered with LT. Each dose was prepared in a final volume of 20 μl in PBS (pH 7.2) and 10 μl per nare was administered to lightly anaesthetised animals. Mice were immunised on days 1, 14, 28 and for the second experiment additionally on 42. Serum samples were collected from the tail vein of each animal on the day before each immunisation, day 13, day 27 and day 41. All animals were exsanguinated mTOR inhibitor on day 42 (expt 1) or day 56 (expt 2) by cardiac puncture. Nasal and lung lavages were performed [22] on day 42 or 56 respectively using 0.1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin in PBS. Samples were all stored at −20 °C prior to testing. Whilst immunogenicity studies

were performed in BALB/c mice to provide robust and reproducible data for statistical analysis, challenge experiments were performed in MF1 outbred mice which are more susceptible to a wider range of pneumococcal serotypes than BALB/c mice. Groups of 35 female MF1 mice were immunised i.n. as

described above on days 1, 14 and found 28 with 0.2 μg of PsaAPLY, PsaAΔ6PLY and PsaA. Fourteen days after the final immunisation, all 35 mice were sample bled and 5 mice from each group were culled and mucosal washes prepared. The PsaA specific IgG and IgA response in the blood and mucosal washes were then determined by ELISA. The remaining animals were challenged with S. pneumoniae D39 (serotype 2) and bioluminescent TIGR4 (serotype 4) and A66.1 (serotype 3) on day 56 of the experiment. Different serotypes were chosen to allow assessment of the level of cross-protection that could be observed using this vaccination protocol. Protection from colonisation and invasive disease were determined separately (n = 5 mice for each) using 5 × 107 cfu delivered in 10 μl and 5 × 106 cfu in 50 μl volumes respectively. The impact of vaccination on subsequent disease progression was determined directly by the recovery and enumeration of bacteria in the blood and mucosal tissues from the animals 72 h post-infection. Anti-PLY, anti-eGFP and anti-PsaA responses within individual serum samples were determined by enzyme linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA).