Women who perceived themselves at high risk of HIV infection were more likely to return for their test results than

those who perceived themselves at low or moderate risk (94.6% vs. 86.5%, respectively; OR 2.7; 95% CI 1.3–5.9; P=0.008). Women who had experienced testing before were also more likely to return for GSK2118436 cell line the test results of the current VCT than those who had never been tested (98% vs. 90.7%, respectively; OR 5.0; 95% CI 1.2–21.5; P=0.014). Before VCT, 96% of all participants intended to disclose their status if they were seronegative (to strengthen family ties and to encourage others to have the test) while only 55% of FSWs anticipated revealing an HIV-positive status (in order to obtain moral and financial support, to have access to treatment and to avoid transmitting the infection). Women not intending to reveal their HIV-positive status (189 of 421; 44.9%) cited the fear of social exclusion by their families or discrimination by their entourage (peers, friends, bar managers, etc.) (Table 2). FSWs who had never attended the AHS and thus who did not receive VCT cited fears of being associated with sex work and of a breach in confidentiality if the result was positive: ‘If the girls have AIDS, MS-275 cost they prefer that medical staff not know. They worry that they will tell the bar

owner who may fire them’ [I 20]. Moreover, some bar managers reportedly forbade FSWs to be tested and to go to AHS. Perceived risk of infection and the desire to protect oneself seemed important: ‘It is not someone’s opinion that pushed me towards this test, I decided it myself; it is for my own health.’ (Focus Group (FG) 1P2); ‘The advantage

is that after having the test, we are sure of our status. If one has the disease, she will try to get relieved Janus kinase (JAK) and if one is not infected, she will adopt an exemplary behaviour’ (FG 1P3). Several participants who got tested reported that members of their entourage who were aware of their sex work approved of the test: ‘Because they know that we are working in the bars and that it is over there that one can have these diseases, they encourage us to get tested’ (FG 4P1); ‘While living together, we exchange clothes, we eat together, so they tell us to go for the test. It makes it possible to know if we are infected in order to avoid contaminating others’ (FG 1P3). Lastly, the possibility of receiving treatment given a positive result seemed to increase VCT acceptability: ‘If I have the test, doctors will be able to help me get treated’ (I 11); ‘It is important to know if one is sick to be able to have the treatment’ (FG 10P3); ‘I did not get the test … because if you get this disease, you will die’ (FG 7P3); ‘This disease does not have a remedy’ (I 16). At follow-up 1 year later, 223 (53.0%) of those participating in the study at baseline agreed to participate again; 15 participants refused to do so (3.6%), 14 were reportedly deceased (3.3%), 21 had reportedly moved (5.0%), 10 had reportedly abandoned sex work (2.