1 to 1 reduces the peak values of S abs and S sca by about a factor of 3.5 each. This indicates the need of a compromise between the performance of an HGN ensemble and the fabrication tolerance. Regardless of σ, the ensemble exhibiting the maximum absorption efficiency comprises of HGNs with core radii smaller than those required for maximizing the scattering efficiency. A similar trend exists for the optimal distribution f(h;μ H ,σ), with absorbing

nanoshells being much thinner than the scattering ones. Figure 2 Optimal lognormal distributions of core radius and shell thickness in an ensemble of hollow gold nanoshells exhibiting maximum average [(a) and (b)] absorption and [(c) and (d)] scattering efficiencies for σ =σ R = σ H =0.1 , 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0. The simulation parameters are the same as in Figures 1(a) and 1(b). The dependencies of the peak absorption ML323 datasheet and scattering efficiencies on the excitation wavelength are plotted in Figure 3(a) for n=1.55. The efficiencies are seen to monotonously decrease with λ, which makes shorter-wavelength near-infrared lasers preferable for both absorption- and scattering-based applications. Figures

3(b) and 3(c) show the ATM/ATR cancer dispersion HSP inhibitor of the geometric means for the optimal nanoshell distributions. One can see that the best performance is achieved for the nanoshells of smaller sizes, excited at shorter wavelengths. These results are summarized in the following polynomial fittings of the theoretical curves: Med[R]≈λ(21σ 2−61σ+106)−44σ 2+72σ−48 and Med[H]≈λ

2(−58σ 2+65σ+44)+λ(103σ 2−127σ−78)−56σ 2+77σ+39 for absorption, and Med[R]≈λ(281σ 2−409σ+225)−266σ 2+376σ−146 and Med[H]≈λ 2(−966σ 3+1921σ 2−1150σ+244)+λ(1731σ 3−3439σ 2+2046σ−430)−803σ 3+1607σ 2−967σ+231for scattering. Here λ is expressed in micrometers, 0.1≤σ≤1, and the accuracy of the geometric means is about ±1 nm. Figure 3 [(a) and (d)] Optimal average absorption (filled circles) and scattering (open circles) efficiencies, and parameters [(b) and (e)] Med [R] and [(c) and (f)] Med[H] of the corresponding optimal distributions as functions of excitation wavelength and tissue refractive index. Carnitine palmitoyltransferase II In (a)–(c), n=1.55; in (d)–(f), λ=850 nm. Solid, dashed, and dotted curves correspond to σ=0.25, 0.5, and 1.0, respectively. The parameters of the optimal lognormal distribution also vary with the type of human tissue. Figures 3(d)–3(f) show such variation for the entire span of refractive indices of human cancerous tissue [9, 19], λ=850 nm, and three typical shapes of the distribution. It is seen that the peak efficiencies of absorption and scattering by an HGN ensemble grow with n regardless of the shape parameter σ. The corresponding geometric mean of the core radii reduces with n and may be approximated as Med[R]≈n(−51σ 2+87σ−65)+72σ 2−136σ+147 for absorption, and as Med[R]≈n(−94σ 2+142σ−87)+114σ 2−179σ+178 for scattering.