9 Lastly, transmission of influenza A/Taiwan/1/86 (H1N1) associated with the transfer of military personnel to Florida may have occurred preflight in the barracks of Puerto Rico.10 In summary, the literature includes four passengers with probable in-flight transmission of the pandemic virus, none with seasonal virus—the risk of transmission is very small; such evidence contradicts common belief. As there is suspected underreporting, additional research is indicated, but by own experience that is difficult click here as airlines are unlikely to collaborate, except possibly in China. Based on four cases only, there is insufficient evidence to claim that long-haul flights would confer the highest risk of transmission.
study so far has compared transmission on long versus short flights and neither the GeoSentinel report nor the quoted Swedish review11 included additional cases to add evidence. The latter actually seems to have been misquoted as it was referring to the different matter that “Air transportation, and especially long-haul flight, is a key factor for the spread of influenza.”11 Also, a mathematical model trying to calculate within-flight transmission of influenza wrongly used as a basic assumption that the plane in Alaska “managed Osimertinib in vitro to infect 72% of passengers during a 3-hour flight on a plane without ventilation,”12 while this aircraft actually was on the ground for that period of time.7 One should, Arachidonate 15-lipoxygenase however, not conclude that an aircraft cabin is germ-free; disease transmission of other infectious diseases has been documented. With respect to etiology of acute respiratory infections in a period of pandemic, both the French13 and Saudi14 experiences are instructive.
At a Paris hospital returning patients with respiratory tract infections were consecutively investigated for pathogens from April to July 2009; similarly at the King Abdulaziz International Airport in Jeddah random samples of pilgrims were investigated pre- and post-Hajj 2009. The pathogen detection rate was 65.6% among the patients with respiratory disease, while the probably asymptomatic pilgrims had rates of 12.5% on arrival, 14.8% on departure back home, respectively. During the early influenza pandemic phase in Paris, the predominant pathogens to be associated with the respiratory tract infection among the 99 evaluated patients were rhinovirus (20%), influenza A(H1N1) 2009 (18%), and other influenza viruses (14%). Streptococci were cultured from 4.0% of the population; these four patients were among the eight with tonsillitis as a leading symptom. In the pilgrim population a broad variety of viruses was detected, mainly entero- and rhinoviruses, but influenza viruses were a small minority. The lesson learned is that at least during the initial phase of an influenza pandemic other infections may persist even if patients have respiratory tract symptoms.