The difficulty with determining the exact incidence of radiosurgery-induced hypopituitarism stems in part from the fact that many of the patients have already undergone previous radiation therapy or surgery. In addition, pituitary deficiencies may result in part from normal aging. Thus, it is likely that hypopituitarism in the post-radiosurgical population is multifactorial in etiology and related to radiosurgery as well as to age-related changes and previous treatments. However, in 347 patients with secretory pituitary adenomas treated, only 1.7% patients developed hypopituitarism. The MASEP rotary gamma knife may
make an important contribution to this result. The 25 60-Co sources were all rotating during the whole treatment process and the healthy pituitary stalk received Napabucasin order much less dose of irradiation than in the radiosurgery with traditional static gamma knife. We proposed that the dose of irradiation on pituitary tissue may be the most important cause of hypopituitarism.
Kokubo reported the similar findings[32]. Conclusion In summary, MASEP GKRS can be an effective method for controlling tumor growth and inducing hormonal normalization in patients with functioning pituitary. The treatment is safe with low mortality and morbidity. Complications from the optic apparatus have not been found when the dose to that area is below 10 Gy. Brain necrosis, neuropsychological disturbances and secondary brain tumors have not been found with gamma knife radiosurgery. The incidence of post-radiosurgery hypopituitarism is very low and the development of hypopituitarism following radiosurgery can be avoided
by observing the GSK1120212 cell line maximum mean dose on healthy peritumoral pituitary of 15 Gy according to our experience. In our treatment, the rotary gamma knife is proved to be as safety and efficient as the static gamma knife. Long-term follow up after MASEP GKRS for control of pituitary function is still needed even when the patient is in remission due to the risk of late occurring pituitary insufficiency. Acknowledgements The authors wish to express many thanks to Doctor Mingxia Zhu and technician Zeyong Sitaxentan Zhou in the Department of Functional surgery of the Chengdu Air-force 452 Hospital for their help with the data collection and for valuable suggestions and discussion. References 1. Laws ER Jr, Vance ML: Radiosurgery for pituitary tumors and craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1999, 10: 327–336.PubMed 2. Petrovich Z, Jozsef G, Yu C, Apuzzo MLJ: Radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary tumors. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2003, 14: 147–166.CrossRefPubMed 3. Landolt AM, Lomax N: Gamma knife radiosurgery for prolactinomas. J Neurosurg 2000, 93 (Suppl 3) : 14–18.PubMed 4. Landolt AM, Haller D, Lomax N, Scheib S, Schubiger O, Siegfried J, Wellis G: Stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent surgically treated acromegaly: Comparison with fractionated radiotherapy.