Figure 3 DSC-determined onset temperatures and energy release values for Al/NiO MIC with different NiO ratios. The dependence of the onset temperatures on the NiO ratios of the composites is shown in Figure 3. It can be observed that increasing the NiO ratio this website did not significantly change the onset temperature of the exothermic peak. This indicates a narrow size distribution of Al nanoparticles in these composites and sufficient intermixing between Al nanoparticles and NiO nanowires.

All measured onset temperatures are smaller than the melting temperature of bulk Al. In the literature, it was suggested that the activation energy of the thermite reaction depends on the diffusion distance over which these metal ions selleck inhibitor (aluminum and nickel which become available from the decomposition of NiO) need to travel before initiating the reaction [46]. To DAPT purchase quantify the activation energy of the Al nanoparticle and NiO nanowire composites, the DSC curves of sample D was processed directly using the TA software and through the implementation of the American Society for Testing and Materials E698 method. Note that the ASTM method is often the only effective approach to analyze reactions with multiple exotherms because these peak temperatures at different heating rates are not significantly influenced by the baseline shift [47]. The ASTM E698 method generally gives an accurate assessment

of the activation energy. However, calculations Reverse transcriptase of the pre-exponential factor (Z) assume the nth order reaction behavior. The derived activation energies for sample D are 216.3 and 214.5 kJ/mol, respectively, from two methods. Figure 4 shows the procedure

to determine the activation energy from the DSC data when the kinetic rate was expressed as a function β(T) of the temperatures T max corresponding to the maximum heat flow. The derived activation energy agrees generally with the previously reported activation energies for Al nanoparticle-based thermite composites (such as, 248, 222, and 205 kJ/mol for the Al-Fe2O3, Al-Bi2O3, and Al-MnO3, respectively [48]). The activation energy of the Al nanoparticle and NiO nanowire MIC is close to but lower than the reported activation energy of the NiO reduction process (277 KJ/mol [49]). Taking into account the size effect on the reactivity of NiO nanowires, this ignition energy may indicate a thermal decomposition of NiO about the onset temperature of the studied MIC, which behaves similarly to the ignition of the Al-Bi2O3 MIC [50]. Meanwhile, for heterogeneous condensed phase MICs, the limiting factor affecting the ignition event can also be the solid-phase diffusion. Further investigations on the ignition mechanism of the Al/NiO MIC are expected. Figure 4 Graph used for determining the activation energy of sample D, 33 wt.% NiO, using ASTM E698 method. The XRD analysis was performed on the reaction products from sample D which was a fuel-rich MIC with Φ = 3.5.

The investigated putative promoter regions are localized immediately upstream

of genes SCO0934 (B), SCO1773 (C), SCO1774 (D), SCO3857 (E), SCO4157 #SYN-117 clinical trial randurls[1|1|,|CHEM1|]# (F), SCO4421 (G), and SCO7449 (H). Representative images are shown here, and quantitative analysis in Table  1. Scale bar, 4μm. Table 1 Fluorescence-based assays of promoter activity Average fluorescence intensity (arbitrary unit)   Spores Vegetative hyphae Strain Avga 95CI Avga 95CIe M145 19.0 16.2 – 21.9 3.51 -5.73 – 12.8 pKF210 21.3c 17.8 – 24.8 -11.1 -23.1 – 0.940 SCO0934b 68.7d 65.3 – 72.1 -18.7 -26.9 – -10.4 SCO1773b 35.5d 32.2 – 38.9 18.1 2.20 – 34.0 SCO1774b 1467d 1440 – 1493 14.3 1.39 – 27.2 SCO3857b 1077d 1048 – 1105 6.08 -2.98 – 15.1 SCO4157b 93.4d 90.1 – 96.7 12.33 4.39 – 20.3 SCO4421b 586d 568 – 604 6.02 2.04 – 10.0 SCO7449b 831d 805 – 856 15.7 8.87 – 22.5 aAverage intensity value per pixel after subtraction of background signals from the medium. The fluorescence intensity was measured in areas of 0.22 μm2 per spore (totally between mTOR signaling pathway 454–743 spores per strain) and in 50 randomly selected areas (0.22 μm2) of the surrounding medium. bPromoter region of corresponding gene translationally fused to the gene encoding the fluorescent protein mCherry (mCh) in pKF210, integrated into the chromosome of M145. cDifference from M145 not significant (P = 0.37) according to Student’s t test. dDifference from M145/pKF210

highly significant (P > 0.001) according to Student’s t test. e95% confidence interval. SCO7449-7451 – a gene cluster with relation to spore pigmentation Among the genes showing the largest difference in expression between whi mutants and parent was SCO7449, which encodes ADP ribosylation factor a predicted membrane protein of unknown function. The qRT-PCR analysis confirmed the strong up-regulation of SCO7449 during sporulation and showed a strict

dependence of this up-regulation on both whiA and whiH (Figure  5). The transcriptional reporter gene construct showed expression specifically in sporulating hyphae (Figure  7). We noted that also the two adjacent genes SCO7450 and SCO7451 (Figure  4) were significantly up-regulated during development of the wild-type strain (Additional file 1: Table S1). These two genes also showed a tendency to be down-regulated in the two whi mutants, although this difference was not statistically significant. We consider it likely that the three genes SCO7449-7451 are co-transcribed. To test whether this group of genes has any function during sporulation, the whole putative operon SCO7449-7451 was deleted and replaced by an apramycin resistance cassette (strain K317). We did not detect any phenotypic effect of the disruption in relation to growth, efficiency of aerial mycelium and spore formation, or shape and stress tolerance of the spores (Figures  8 and 9).

Table 1 Summary of EL performance of all WOLEDs in this study   V on a(V) CEmax b(cd/A) PEmax c(lm/W) CEdat 1,000 cd/m2(cd/A) PEeat 1,000 cd/m2(lm/W) CIE at 10 V ( x , y ) Reference device 3.52 10.7 5.5 10.6

5.2 (0.38, 0.45) Device A 3.56 16.4 8.3 16.2 8.1 (0.32, 0.45) Device B 3.76 11.0 4.4 10.9 4.2 (0.32, 0.45) Device C 3.82 8.1 3.5 8.0 3.1 (0.24, 0.35) aTurn-on voltage; bmaximum current efficiency; cmaximum power efficiency; dcurrent efficiency at 1,000 cd/m2; epower efficiency at 1,000 cd/m2. Figure 3 The schematic energy see more level diagram of WOLEDs with the portion of EMLs. (a) device A. (b) device B. (c) device C. Black click here circle and white circle express electron and hole, respectively. The numbers indicate the check details LUMO and HOMO energies relative to vacuum (in eV). Here, LUMO and HOMO are cited from [18–20]. Figure 4 The EL spectra of all WOLEDs under various voltages. (a) Reference device, (b) device A, (c) device B, and (d) device C. Another two MQW structure WOLEDs have low efficiencies compared to device A, even lower than that of the reference device. Devices A, B, and C offer a peak luminance of 17

700, 13,200, and 8,489 cd/m2, respectively. The difference between luminances indicates the different recombination efficiencies because luminance is generally decided by the recombination degree between electrons and holes [21]. Table 1 summarizes the EL performances of all devices. Such a large difference between their EL performances could be understood from different alignments between LUMO/HOMO energy levels of EML/PBL due to the use of different PBL materials. First, let us see the schematic energy level diagrams of WOLEDs with the portion of EMLs that are shown in Figure 3. Device A with TPBi as PBL belongs to the foregoing type-I MQW structure, and LUMO/HOMO energy levels (bandgap) of each EML located within LUMO/HOMO energy levels of TPBi and

two carriers are confined in the EML, while devices B and C belong to the type-II MQW structure with Bphen and BCP as PBL, respectively. The LUMO/HOMO Selleckchem MK-3475 energy levels of PBL and EML are staggered, and only a single carrier is confined in the EML. For device A, there is a 0.2-eV barrier at the interface of either [LUMO]EML/[LUMO]TPBi or [HOMO]EML/[HOMO]TPBi, and such an energy level alignment makes electrons and holes distribute uniformly in the EMLs that act as potential wells under electrical excitation. All the electrons and holes could be confined in EMLs due to the presence of a suitable energy level of TPBi, which would increase a recombination possibility between the two carriers and produce more excitons in EML [22]. For device B, the potential well of holes is the EML with a 0.4-eV barrier at the [HOMO]EML/[HOMO]Bphen interface; injected holes could easily be confined within the HOMO energy level of EML. However, there is only a 0.

Methods In this paper, we investigate a series of five bulk undoped GaAsBi samples, grown on a low-temperature (LT)-grown GaAs buffer layer and a semi-insulating GaAs (100) substrate in a RIBER solid-source molecular beam epitaxy system. The GaAsBi layer is elastically strained in all samples, and the corresponding Bi concentration is listed in Table 1. Both these information have been confirmed via HR-XRD. Table 1 Bi fraction of the selleck chemicals investigated GaAsBi samples Sample number Bi% 1 1.16

2 1.8 3 2.34 4 3.04 5 3.83 The samples were mounted in a closed cycle He-cooled cryostat, where the temperature varied from 10 to 300 K. Optical excitation was provided by focusing 1.5 ps pulses generated by a mode-locked Ti-sapphire laser learn more with 80-MHz repetition frequency. The laser wavelength was fixed at λ exc = 795 nm to allow both the GaAs and GaAsBi layer to be excited, and the beam was focused on a 50-μm diameter spot at the sample surface. The incident power was varied by means of neutral density filters from 0.01 to 150 mW, which corresponds to a typical photon flux at the sample surface from 2.5 × 1010

to 3.8 × 1014 cm−2, respectively. Assuming that GaAsBi has the same absorption coefficient as GaAs, we estimate an average photon number absorbed in the GaAsBi layer from 109 to 1014 cm−3. Time-integrated and time-resolved photoluminescence (PL), measured along the sample growth direction, were collected using a S1 photocathode Hamamatsu streak camera (Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Naka-ku, Japan) with an overall time resolution Ribose-5-phosphate isomerase of 8 ps, as a function of incident power and sample temperature. Results and discussion From the investigation of the GaAsBi PL peak emission energy www.selleckchem.com/products/poziotinib-hm781-36b.html versus temperature, a deviation of the obtained values from the expected Varshni fit is observed, especially at low excitation power densities (Figure 1). This feature, whose amplitude depends more upon the sample growth conditions than the Bi content [14], disappears when increasing the incident excitation power density due to the complete filling of the localized states, as previously reported [11, 15].

Figure 1 GaAsBi PL peak emission energy vs. temperature for sample 2 (1.8% Bi). Due to the high localization effect observed at low temperature, investigation was focused on the PL behavior at T = 10 K as a function of laser incident power P in. Figure 2 shows the PL spectra of all samples taken at P in = 10 mW. Figure 2 Spectral PL emission of the investigated samples at P in   = 10 mW and T  = 10 K. The energy red shift of the PL peak with increasing Bi% is clearly evidenced, in agreement with the literature results [4]. In our case, the amplitude of this shift is equal to about 75 meV/Bi%. On the other side, a semilog plot of the PL peak energy versus P in shows that the GaAsBi PL peak blue shifts with P in in the same way for all samples. These results are extracted from the experimental data reported in Figure 3. Figure 3 PL peak energy vs. P in .

PubMedCrossRef 10. Rawlings ND, Morton FR, Kok CY, Kong J, Barrett AJ: MEROPS: the peptidase database. PND-1186 purchase Nucleic Acids Res 2008,36(Database issue):D320–325.PubMed 11. Bochtler M, Odintsov SG, Marcyjaniak MK-8931 order M, Sabala I: Similar active sites in lysostaphins and D-Ala-D-Ala metallopeptidases. Protein Sci 2004,13(4):854–861.PubMedCrossRef 12. Odintsov SG, Sabala I, Marcyjaniak M, Bochtler

M: Latent LytM at 1.3A resolution. J Mol Biol 2004,335(3):775–785.PubMedCrossRef 13. Lu JZ, Fujiwara T, Komatsuzawa H, Sugai M, Sakon J: Cell wall-targeting domain of glycylglycine endopeptidase distinguishes among peptidoglycan cross-bridges. J Biol Chem 2006,281(1):549–558.PubMedCrossRef 14. Strauss A, Thumm G, Gotz F: Influence MLN2238 concentration of Lif, the lysostaphin immunity factor, on acceptors of surface proteins and cell wall sorting efficiency in Staphylococcus carnosus. J Bacteriol 1998,180(18):4960–4962.PubMed 15. Kerr DE, Plaut K, Bramley AJ, Williamson CM, Lax AJ, Moore K, Wells KD, Wall RJ: Lysostaphin expression in mammary glands confers protection against staphylococcal infection in transgenic mice. Nat Biotechnol 2001,19(1):66–70.PubMedCrossRef 16. Harrison EF, Zygmunt WA: Lysostaphin in experimental renal infections. J Bacteriol 1967,93(2):520–524.PubMed 17. Dajcs JJ, Hume EB, Moreau JM, Caballero AR, Cannon BM, O’Callaghan

RJ: Lysostaphin treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus keratitis in the rabbit(1). Am J Ophthalmol 2000,130(4):544.PubMedCrossRef 18. Dajcs JJ, Thibodeaux BA, Hume EB, Zheng X, Sloop GD, O’Callaghan RJ: Lysostaphin is effective in treating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis in the rabbit. Curr Eye Res 2001,22(6):451–457.PubMedCrossRef

very 19. Dajcs JJ, Thibodeaux BA, Girgis DO, Shaffer MD, Delvisco SM, O’Callaghan RJ: Immunity to lysostaphin and its therapeutic value for ocular MRSA infections in the rabbit. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002,43(12):3712–3716.PubMed 20. Kumar JK: Lysostaphin: an antistaphylococcal agent. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2008,80(4):555–561.PubMedCrossRef 21. Bastos MC, Ceotto H, Coelho ML, Nascimento JS: Staphylococcal antimicrobial peptides: relevant properties and potential biotechnological applications. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2009,10(1):38–61.PubMedCrossRef 22. Wu JA, Kusuma C, Mond JJ, Kokai-Kun JF: Lysostaphin disrupts Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms on artificial surfaces. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003,47(11):3407–3414.PubMedCrossRef 23. Shah A, Mond J, Walsh S: Lysostaphin-coated catheters eradicate Staphylococccus aureus challenge and block surface colonization. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004,48(7):2704–2707.PubMedCrossRef 24. Kokai-Kun JF, Chanturiya T, Mond JJ: Lysostaphin eradicates established Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in jugular vein catheterized mice. J Antimicrob Chemother 2009,64(1):94–100.PubMedCrossRef 25.

PubMedCrossRef 22. DeKeersmaecker SC, Vanderleyden J: Constraints on detection of autoinducer-2 (AI-2) signalling molecules P5091 cell line using Vibrio harveyi as a reporter. Microbiology 2003,149(Pt 8):1953–1956.PubMedCrossRef 23. Greenberg EP, Hastings JW, Ulitzer S: Induction of luciferase synthesis in Beneckea harveyi by other marine bacteria. Arch Microbiol 1979, 120:87–91.CrossRef 24. Wand ME, Sockett RE, Evans KJ, Doherty N, Sharp PM, Hardie KR, Winzer K: Helicobacter pylori FlhB function:

the FlhB C-terminal homologue HP1575 acts as a “”spare part”" to permit flagellar export when the HP0770 FlhBCC domain is deleted. J Bacteriol 2006,188(21):7531–7541.PubMedCrossRef 25. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd edition. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press,

Cold Spring Harbor, N Y; 1989. 26. Letley DP, Rhead JL, Twells RJ, Dove B, Atherton JC: Determinants of non-toxicity in the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori . J Biol Chem 2003,278(29):26734–26741.PubMedCrossRef 27. Hall TA: BioEdit: a user-frendly selleck chemicals llc biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT//Nuclec Acids Symp. Ser 1999, 41:95–98. 28. Reynolds DJ, Penn CW: Characteristics of Helicobacter pylori growth in a defined medium and determination of its amino acid requirements. Microbiology 1994,140(Pt 10):2649–2656.PubMedCrossRef 29. Marshall BJ, Royce H, Annear DI, Goodwin CS, Pearman JW, Warren JR, Armstrong JA: Original isolation of Campylobacter pyloridis from human gastric mucosa. Microbios Lett 1984, 25:83–88. 30. O’Toole PW, Kostrzynska M, Trust TJ: Non-motile mutants of Helicobacter pylori and Helicobacter mustelae defective in flagellar hook production. Mol Microbiol 1994,14(4):691–703.PubMedCrossRef 31. Towbin H, Staehelin T, Gordon J: Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Biotechnology 1992, 24:145–149.PubMed

32. Ryan KA, Karim N, Worku M, Penn CW, O’Toole PW: Helicobacter pylori flagellar hook-filament transition is controlled by a FliK functional homolog encoded by the gene HP0906. J Bacteriol 2005,187(16):5742–5750.PubMedCrossRef 33. Niehus E, Gressmann H, Ye F, Schlapbach R, Dehio M, these Dehio C, Stack A, Meyer TF, Suerbaum S, CT99021 datasheet Josenhans C: Genome-wide analysis of transcriptional hierarchy and feedback regulation in the flagellar system of Helicobacter pylori . Mol Microbiol 2004,52(4):947–961.PubMedCrossRef 34. Doherty N, Holden MT, Qazi SN, Williams P, Winzer K: Functional analysis of luxS in Staphylococcus aureus reveals a role in metabolism but not quorum sensing. J Bacteriol 2006,188(8):2885–2897.PubMedCrossRef 35. Suerbaum S, Josenhans C, Labigne A: Cloning and genetic characterization of the Helicobacter pylori and Helicobacter mustelae flaB flagellin genes and construction of H. pylori flaA – and flaB -negative mutants by electroporation-mediated allelic exchange. J Bacteriol 1993,175(11):3278–3288.PubMed 36.

In particular, selleckchem Si QD is persistently considered as a candidate for next-generation light emitters in Si photonics

because of its greatly improved internal and external quantum efficiencies [7, 8]. To further improve the device performance, utilization of Si-rich Si-based dielectric materials as Si QDs’ matrices has also been developed [9, 10]. A suitable matrix material for Si QDs is very important for better device performance. We propose to embed Si QDs into a ZnO thin film because ZnO has many desirable features to function as Si QDs’ matrix material, e.g., wide and direct bandgap, high transparency, and highly tunable

electrical properties [11]. Hence, ZnO can serve as the Si QDs’ matrix to achieve bandgap engineering, reduce the optical loss from the matrix’s absorption, and efficiently enhance the carrier transport efficiency for optoelectronic device application. Selleckchem GSK690693 The fabrication and fundamental optical properties of the Si QD-embedded ZnO thin films have been reported in our previous works [12, 13]. In this study, improvement of optical transmittance and electrical properties of the Si QD-embedded ZnO thin films is investigated and discussed. Methods The ZnO/Si multilayer (ML) thin films with 20 bilayers are deposited on p-type Si (100) substrates or fused quartzes at room temperature using the radio-frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering

method. The sputtering powers of ZnO and Si are fixed at 75 and 110 W, and the effective thicknesses Etoposide solubility dmso of each ZnO and Si layer are fixed at 5 and 3 nm, respectively. After deposition, the ZnO/Si ML thin films are annealed at 500°C, 600°C, 700°C, or 800°C for 30 min in N2 environment. For electrical measurements, 100-nm-thick Al and Ni metal layers are deposited on the top and bottom surfaces of devices as electrodes using a thermal coater. The Raman spectra are measured using a 488-nm diode-pumped solid-state laser (HORIBA LabRam HR, HORIBA, Kyoto, Japan). The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns are examined by a Bede-D1 X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (Bede Scientific, Engelwood, CO, USA). The transmittance spectra are obtained using a UV–vis-NIR spectrophotometer (Hitachi U-4100, Hitachi Ltd., Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan). The cross-sectional morphologies are observed by a JSM-6500 F field-emission scanning electron microscope (SEM; JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Tokyo, Japan). The current–voltage (I-V) GS-9973 curves are measured using an Agilent E5270B precision measurement mainframe (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA).

Biophys J 84(4):2508–2516PubMed Croce R, Muller

MG, Caffarri S, Bassi R, Holzwarth AR (2003b) Energy transfer pathways in the minor antenna complex CP29 of www.selleckchem.com/small-molecule-compound-libraries.html photosystem II: a femtosecond study of carotenoid to chlorophyll transfer on mutant and WT complexes. Biophys J 84(4):2517–2532PubMed Daum B, Nicastro D, Austin J II, McIntosh JR, Kuhlbrandt W (2010) Arrangement of photosystem II and ATP synthase in chloroplast membranes of spinach and pea. Plant Cell 22(4):1299–1312PubMed de Bianchi S, Dall’Osto L, Tognon G, Morosinotto T, Bassi R (2008) Minor antenna proteins CP24 and CP26 affect the interactions between photosystem II subunits and the electron transport rate in grana membranes of arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20(4):1012–1028PubMed Dekker JP, Boekema EJ (2005) Supramolecular organization of thylakoid membrane proteins in green plants. Biochim Biophys Acta 1706:12–39PubMed Dunahay TG, LY2606368 mw Staehelin LA, Seibert M, Ogilvie PD, Berg SP (1984) Structural, biochemical and biophysical characterization JAK inhibitor of four oxygen-evolving photosystem II preparations

from spinach. Biochim Biophys Acta 764:179–193 Durrant JR, Hastings G, Joseph DM, Barber J, Porter G, Klug DR (1992) Subpicosecond equilibration of excitation energy in isolated photosystem II reaction centers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:11632–11636PubMed Engelmann ECM, Zucchelli G, Garlaschi FM, Casazza AP, Jennings RC (2005) The effect of outer antenna complexes on the photochemical trapping rate in barley thylakoid photosystem II. Biochim Biophys Acta 1706(3):276–286PubMed Georgakopoulou S, van der Zwan G, Bassi R, van Grondelle R, van Amerongen H, Croce R (2007) Understanding the changes in the circular dichroism

of light harvesting Branched chain aminotransferase complex II upon varying its pigment composition and organization. Biochemistry 46(16):4745–4754PubMed Germano M, Gradinaru CC, Shkuropatov AY, van Stokkum IH, Shuvalov VA, Dekker JP, van Grondelle R, van Gorkom HJ (2004) Energy and electron transfer in photosystem II reaction centers with modified pheophytin composition. Biophys J 86(3):1664–1672PubMed Goral TK, Johnson MP, Brain APR, Kirchhoff H, Ruban AV, Mullineaux CW (2010) Visualizing the mobility and distribution of chlorophyll proteins in higher plant thylakoid membranes: effects of photoinhibition and protein phosphorylation. Plant J 62(6):948–959PubMed Gradinaru CC, Pascal AA, van Mourik F, Robert B, Horton P, van Grondelle R, Van Amerongen H (1998) Ultrafast evolution of the excited states in the chlorophyll a/b complex CP29 from green plants studied by energy-selective pump- probe spectroscopy. Biochemistry 37:1143–1149PubMed Gradinaru CC, van Stokkum IHM, Pascal AA, van Grondelle R, Van Amerongen H (2000) Identifying the pathways of energy transfer between carotenoids and chlorophylls in LHCII and CP29. A multicolor, femtosecond pump-probe study.

All GO terms below exist in the biological process ontology. For brevity, several other PCD-related GO terms are not shown: “”GO: 0048102 autophagic cell death”", “”GO: 0016244 non-apoptotic programmed cell death”", “”GO: 0010623 developmental programmed cell death”", “”GO: 0043067 regulation of programmed cell death”", “”GO: 0043069 negative regulation

of programmed cell death”", “”GO: 0043068 positive regulation of programmed cell death”", and “”GO: 0010343 singlet oxygen-mediated programmed cell death”". (DOC 33 KB) Additional file 2:”"GO: A 769662 0052248 modulation of programmed cell death in other SAHA HDAC research buy organism during symbiotic interaction”" and child terms. Selected term information fields (“”Term name”", “”Accession”", “”Synonyms”", and “”Definition”") are shown for each GO term. Unlike the terms shown in Table 1, the terms included here are appropriate to use in describing genes in one organism whose products modulate programmed cell death in another organism. For more context, “”GO: 0052248 modulation of programmed cell death in other organism during symbiotic interaction”" can be seen also in Figure2, highlighted in black. (DOC 28 KB) References 1. AmiGO! Your friend in the Gene Ontology[http://​amigo.​geneontology.​org]

2. Perfect SE, Green JR:Infection structures of biotrophic and hemibiotrophic fungal plant pathogens. Molecular Plant Pathology2001,2(2):101–108.PubMedCrossRef CYC202 mw 3. Chibucos MC, Tyler BM:Common themes in nutrient acquisition by plant symbiotic microbes, described by The Gene Ontology. BMC Microbiology2009,9(Suppl 1):S6.PubMedCrossRef 4. Lam E:Controlled cell death, plant survival and development. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol.2004,5:305–315.PubMedCrossRef 5. Barcelo AR:Xylem parenchyma cells deliver the H 2 O 2 necessary for lignification in differentiating xylem vessels. Planta2005,220(5):747–756.CrossRef 6. Hofius D, Tsitsigiannis DI, Jones JDG, click here Mundy J:Inducible cell death in plant immunity. Semin Cancer Biol.2007,17(2):166–187.PubMedCrossRef 7. Mastroberti AA, Mariath JEdA:Development of mucilage cells of Araucaria angustifolia (Araucariaceae). Protoplasma2008,232(3–4):233–245.PubMedCrossRef 8. Jacobson MD, Weil M, Raff

MC:Programmed cell death in animal development. Cell.1997,88(3):347–354.PubMedCrossRef 9. Greenberg JT:Programmed cell death in plant-pathogen interactions. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol.1997,48:525–545.PubMedCrossRef 10. Zakeri Z, Lockshin RA:Cell death: history and future. Adv Exp Med Biol.2008,615:1–11.PubMedCrossRef 11. Greenberg JT, Yao N:The role and regulation of programmed cell death in plant-pathogen interactions. Cell Microbiol.2004,6(3):201–211.PubMedCrossRef 12. Torto-Alalibo TA, Collmer CW, Gwinn-Giglio M:The Plant-Associated Microbe Gene Ontology (PAMGO) Consortium: Community development of new Gene Ontology terms describing biological processes involved in microbe-host interactions. BMC Microbiology2009,9(Suppl 1):S1.PubMedCrossRef 13.

Conidia produced in colourless wet heads mostly <40 μm, sometimes to 70(–100) μm diam, eventually conidia lying on the agar surface. Phialides (8–)10–17(–26) × (1.8–)2.3–3.0(–4.0) μm, l/w (2.8–)3.5–6.5(–10.3), (1.2–)1.7–2.3(–3.0) μm wide at the base (n = 94), lageniform, long, slender, often thickened below the middle, less commonly in the middle, typically constricted below a

long neck, straight or slightly curved upwards. Conidia (3.0–)3.5–5.0(–7.0) × (2.0–)2.2–2.7(–3.0) μm, l/w (1.2–)1.5–2.1(–2.5) (n = 90), hyaline, oblong, less commonly ellipsoidal, often slightly constricted in the middle, smooth, finely multiguttulate or with 1–2 larger guttules; scar indistinct. Conidiation also occurring within the agar, PX-478 cost particularly Selleckchem Captisol in proximal and

central H 89 supplier areas, conidia formed in heads <15 μm with maximal 15 conidia per head. At 15°C minute sinuous secondary hyphae dominant, particularly at the colony margin. Conidiation colourless, effuse, spreading across the entire colony. At 30°C colony denser in the centre; hyphae thin; conidiation effuse, less abundant than at lower temperatures. On PDA after 72 h 6–10 mm at 15°C, 20–24 mm at 25°C, 7–15 mm at 30°C; mycelium covering the plate after 9–10 days at 25°C. Colony dense, of few flat, broad, concentric zones with irregular outline and a whitish to pale yellowish, downy, hairy, finely floccose or farinose surface. Aerial hyphae numerous, loose, only few mm high, without a distinct Rebamipide orientation, becoming fertile. Autolytic activity inconspicuous or moderate, no coilings seen. Reverse yellowish, cream, 3A3, 4AB3–4. Odour indistinct or slightly sour. Conidiation noted after 2 days at 25°C, effuse, spreading from the centre across the entire colony, abundant, dense in downy areas, short and ascending on aerial

hyphae. Conidiophores loose, verticillium-like; phialides in whorls of 3–5; conidia hyaline, formed in wet heads to 50(–70) μm diam. At 15°C colony dense, hyphae thin, yellowish 3A3, surface downy to farinose, not zonate or 2 irregular zones; conidiation effuse. At 30°C colony compact, circular, dense, finely zonate, glabrous or centre hairy to fluffy. Autolytic excretions lacking at the colony margin, frequent inside the colony, yellow-brown. Reverse yellowish, 4AB3–4. Odour yeast-like to sour. Conidiation effuse, scant or in dense lawns. On SNA after 72 h 9–12 mm at 15°C, 27–32 mm at 25°C, 3–11 mm at 30°C; mycelium covering the plate after 6–7 days at 25°C. Colony similar to CMD, but denser and surface hyphae degenerating, appearing empty. Mycelium not zonate, colony becoming zonate by conidiation. Autolytic activity moderate to conspicuous, coilings nearly lacking. No diffusing pigment, no distinct odour produced. Chlamydospores noted after 2–3 weeks, scant, mainly in the centre; appearing after 10 days and more frequent at 30°C, (4–)5–8(–12) × (4.0–)4.5–6.0(–7.0) μm, l/w 1.0–1.5(–2.